View contents
Article
OpenSeed Product Guide

The Six-Area Check — See at a Glance Which Area of Your Business Plan the Report Flags Most

2026.07.22·8 min·OPENSEED
MENTORING KNOWLEDGE FORChief Analyst

When you get a business plan feedback report, the flags can look scattered and leave you stuck. Key issues, each mentor's comments, and the per-capability diagnosis pile up, but figuring out where to start is left to you. This piece proposes a way to read the report by grouping its flags into six areas — Problem, Solution, Market, Team, Finance, and Execution. The six areas are a checking frame for the person reading the report; OpenSeed's default report screen has no per-area numbers or radar chart. This guide explains what each area checks, how to place the report's flags into areas, and in what order to fix the areas where weaknesses cluster.

Intro.

#A List of Flags Can't Tell You Where the Problem Is

Reading the flags one by one doesn't give you a revision direction. When several key issues are listed in a row, it isn't obvious which area is holding you back.

OpenSeed's AI mentors (17 evaluation roles) each cover their own domain, and the ones that apply to your business area evaluate independently. To take in their opinions in one view, you need a frame for grouping them by area. The six-area check is a reading method for that purpose.

If the flags cluster in one area, that area is weak. If they are spread evenly across several areas, the evidence across the whole document is thin. Either way, the answer to 'where do I start?' is in how the flags are distributed.

02

#What Each of the Six Areas Checks

Each area is an independent thing to check. Strengthening one area does not automatically improve the others. The table below outlines what each area covers and the key things that are often checked.

AreaWhat It CoversThings Often Checked
ProblemWhether the problem being solved is real, significant, and urgentHow specifically the customer pain is described, the limits of existing alternatives, how often the problem occurs
SolutionHow the product or service solves the problem and what makes it differentHow the core functionality works, competitive advantages, evidence of validation
MarketThe size of the target market and how feasible it is to enterEvidence for demand size, segmentation logic, sources for growth rate figures
TeamThe founding team's execution ability and fit with the problemDomain experience, whether key roles are filled, founder motivation
FinanceThe realism of the revenue model and financial planHow revenue projections are calculated, cost structure, break-even scenarios
ExecutionHow concrete the roadmap, milestones, and resource allocation areClarity of stage-by-stage goals, prioritization logic, risk mitigation

These six areas show up repeatedly in virtually every evaluation framework — whether for government grant applications or investor pitch decks. The frame will likely feel familiar the moment you see it.

03

#How to Read the Report's Flags Across Six Areas in 3 Steps

The first time you read a report, the flags can look scattered. Breaking it into three steps makes it easy to turn what you read into action.

  1. Find the area where flags cluster — Place the key issues and mentor comments into the six areas one by one, and find the area with the most flags or the heaviest ones. That area takes priority over overall balance.
  2. Read every comment in the flagged areas — For any area flagged as weak, read every mentor comment without skipping. Thin coverage and flawed logic require different fixes, so identify the root cause first.
  3. Check how adjacent areas connect — If Solution is flagged as weak, the link to your Problem narrative has often broken down. If Finance is flagged as weak, there is frequently a logical gap between your market size estimate and your revenue projections. When you fix one weak area, review its neighbors at the same time.

Each mentor's feedback in the report comes with excerpts of the evidence. Don't stop at the summary — use the specific issues flagged in the comments to define exactly what needs to be revised.

04

#Where to Start — A Practical Priority Order for Fixing Your Weakest Areas

Trying to fix all six areas at once usually means none of them improve enough. The priority order below comes from logical dependency: if the problem definition is shaky, the Solution and Market narratives shake along with it.

PrioritySituationFix This Area FirstWhy
1stProblem area is flagged weakestProblemEvery other area builds on your problem definition. If the problem is unclear, your Solution and Market narratives will unravel along with it.
2ndSolution area is flagged weakestSolution → ExecutionA vague solution makes your execution roadmap hollow. Strengthening both areas together is the most efficient approach.
3rdMarket area is flagged weakestMarket → FinanceWeak evidence for market size undermines your revenue projections. Fix your market sizing first, then rewrite your financial estimates.
4thTeam area is flagged weakestTeamTeam narratives are grounded in facts, so they can be improved independently of the other areas. Add specifics around domain experience, role assignments, and founder motivation.
5thFinance area is flagged weakestFinanceFlesh out your revenue projection formula and cost structure. Remove any unsupported figures — things like 'Year 3 revenue of $10M' with no basis should go immediately.
6thExecution area is flagged weakestExecutionBreak your milestones down to a quarterly level and define clear completion criteria for each stage. Also revisit the logic behind your resource allocation.

If more than one area is flagged as weak at the same time, focus on whichever appears higher in the priority list first. Finishing one or two areas before moving on is faster than trying to overhaul everything at once.

05

#Your Workflow After Reading the Report

The report opens in two tabs: 'Final report' and 'Anticipated judge questions'. After reading the key issues and 'What to do first' in the Final report tab, follow the steps below to move into revision mode without wasting effort.

  1. Open your report, read the key issues and 'What to do first,' then place the flags into the six areas and note which area is flagged most heavily.
  2. Read every mentor comment for that area and write out the flagged issues as a numbered list.
  3. Open the corresponding section of your business plan and work through the issues in order.
  4. Once revisions are done, read through the adjacent areas to confirm the logic still flows.
  5. Check that the revised text alone answers the questions on the Anticipated judge questions tab.
  6. Move on to the next most heavily flagged area and revise the document the same way.

If the same flag still shows up all over the document after you've fixed one area, treat that as a signal to rethink your approach entirely. Instead of polishing sentences, fill in the underlying evidence.

CTA
Submit your business plan now and get a report with key issues, what to do first, and feedback from each mentor. Find out which area to fix first — today. Single submission for ₩9,900.
Summary.

#Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Do the six areas come with per-area numbers or a radar chart?

No. The default report screen has no per-area numbers, grades, or radar chart. At the top of the report you see the perspective distribution of the AI mentors who reviewed it (recommend, conditional, flagged), followed by the key issues and each mentor's feedback. The six areas are a frame the reader uses to organize those flags. A plan written for a government grant program and one prepared for investor fundraising may be weighted differently, so don't treat the areas as equal — base your revision decisions on what the comments actually flag.

Q. How do I fix the Team area if it's flagged as weak?

There are two issues mentors flag most often in team narratives. First, founders list roles without explaining why this particular team is the right one to solve this particular problem. Second, key roles are unfilled and the team either hasn't noticed or has no plan to address it. Check your mentor comments to figure out which of these applies to you before making changes.

Q. If I fix all six areas, does that guarantee approval?

No. The OpenSeed report is not a screen that predicts whether you will be selected or accepted. Actual funding decisions involve many factors beyond the plan itself — market conditions, commercial viability, the priorities of a given program, and more. Use the report to systematically close your weakest gaps. Don't treat it as a pass/fail threshold.

Advertisement

Check Your Business Plan Right Now

Submit your business plan and see which areas the report flags as weakest. Single submission for ₩9,900.

Pre-submission business-plan review with clear service limitations

Start OpenSeed Review →

관련 AI 피드백 서비스.

AI 피드백
사업계획서 AI 추천 →
AI 피드백
사업계획서 피드백 →
AI 피드백
예비창업패키지 점검 →
RELATED · Related pagesOpenSeed Product Guide
What Should Computer Science Students Learn When AI Can Write the Code?2026.07.28 · 8 minReading Your Report in 3 Stages — A Day 1, Day 3, Day 6 Cycle to Apply Every Mentor Comment2026.08.16 · 8 minBusiness Plan Evidence Workflow — How to Separate Claims from Supporting Files and Earn Reviewer Trust2026.11.14 · 5 minHow to Upload Your HWP·HWPX Business Plan Without Converting to PDF2026.11.13 · 4 minWhat the Judge Prep Sheet Shows Mentors2026.10.28 · 5 min
← Back to Wiki