Intro.
#100 Reviewed → 2 Funded: the Full Funnel
In his book, Lee Taek-kyung of Mashup Angels shares a year's worth of actual funnel data from a hypothetical firm he calls "Firm B." There are six decision-making stages, and the reasons founders wash out differ at each one.
| Stage | Deals Reviewed | Stage Conversion | Cumulative Conversion |
|---|
| ① First Meeting | 100 | — | 100% |
| ② Follow-Up Meeting | 40 | 40% | 40% |
| ③ IR Pitch | 15 | 37.5% | 15% |
| ④ Preliminary IC | 8 | 53% | 8% |
| ⑤ Due Diligence | 5 | 62.5% | 5% |
| ⑥ Final IC | 3 | 60% | 3% |
| ⑦ Term Sheet & Funding | 2 | 67% | 2% |
TIP
Conversion rates from stage 4 onward (53–67%) vary relatively little between firms, but conversion rates for stages 1–3 vary wildly by firm (20–70%). In other words, if you're getting cut in stages 1–3, the problem is your business plan or IR materials themselves. If you're getting cut from stage 4 onward, it's a separate issue in due diligence or deal terms.
02
#Stage 1, First Meeting — 60 Deals Lost to Formatting and a Fuzzy One-Line Pitch
60 of every 100 deals end at the decision not to take a second meeting. Modeled on the Lee Taek-kyung persona, here are the most common reasons.
- Materials sent as HWP or DOC — never even opened (PDF is the standard)
- No team introduction — Lee's own phrase for this is a Korean expression for "a bun with no filling" (Ch. 4)
- Can't convey the core business model in under a minute — heavy on abstract buzzwords
- No stated funding amount or timing — makes stage-matching impossible from the start
- Blanket cold emails sent to investors whose stage or sector focus doesn't match
- Wrong investor's name left in the body of a cold email
주의
The rejection you get at this stage is usually a short line like "Best of luck with your business." You don't get a reason because the materials never cleared the bar for a real review.
03
#Stage 2, Follow-Up Meeting — 25 Deals Lost to Weak Pain Point Validation
Of the 40 deals that pass the first meeting, 25 either never get a follow-up scheduled or stall out after one is. This is where deals land when the first meeting went well but ended on a "let's keep watching" note.
| Common Reason | How the VC Puts It | Your Next Move |
|---|
| Weak pain point validation | "Is this really a problem customers will pay to solve?" | Add one piece of evidence — an MVP, interviews, or payment data — then request a follow-up |
| No basis for the market-size estimate | "The market looks small." | Back up TAM/SAM/SOM with objective data |
| Doubts about team cohesion | "How did you two co-founders meet?" | Clarify your shared work history and how responsibilities are split |
| Scheduling keeps slipping | "Let's find time again next month." | Even without a formal rejection, it's time to start looking at other prospects (Ch. 4) |
04
#Stage 3, IR Pitch — 7 Deals Lost to Deck-Writing Mistakes
Of the 15 deals invited to pitch, 7 wash out because of the IR deck itself. The direct cause is usually one of the frequently-broken rules from Lee's eight IR-deck writing tips (Ch. 5).
- All "what," no "how" — states the goal with no step-by-step strategy behind it
- Abstract buzzwords like "world's best" or "unrivaled" with no evidence behind them
- Claims to beat competitors on every single dimension — ignoring that trade-offs exist
- Over-emphasizes outside advisors — masking a weak full-time team
- Avoids mentioning profitability at all
- No mention of a path to exit (IPO or M&A)
TIP
Rejections at this stage usually sound like "we couldn't reach internal consensus this time." That's a signal there's room to re-approach in 6–12 months, once your core hypothesis is validated.
05
#Stages 4–6, IC and Due Diligence — 5 Deals Lost to Failed Verification
Of the 8 deals that clear the preliminary IC, only 3 make it through the final IC. Washouts in this range aren't about the IR deck anymore — they're mostly about "the numbers don't add up" or "legal and financial housekeeping isn't done."
| Stage | Reason | How the VC Puts It Internally |
|---|
| ④ Preliminary IC | Objection from another partner | "One of our partners raised strong concerns." |
| ⑤ Due Diligence | Issues with advances on the books, articles of incorporation, or IP ownership | "Diligence surfaced some things that still need cleaning up." |
| ⑥ Final IC | Valuation negotiations broke down | "We couldn't close the gap on valuation." |
| ⑦ Signing | Failed to agree on onerous terms (like joint-and-several liability under a share buyback/put-option clause) | "We couldn't agree on standard terms." |
06
#Reverse-Engineering Your Stage From the Tone of the Rejection
No VC will spell out "you got cut at stage 3." You have to reverse-engineer it from the tone of the rejection. This is exactly why Lee's book includes the line "an investor who rejects you quickly is doing you a favor" — read the tone correctly, and it becomes usable information for your next attempt.
| Rejection Tone | Likely Stage | Next Move |
|---|
| No response at all, or "Best of luck with your business" | Stage ① — formatting or an unclear one-line pitch | Fix your PDF, team intro, and one-line pitch, then try again |
| "Let's talk again once you've made more progress" | Stage ② — insufficient validation | Build an MVP and payment data, then re-approach in 6 months |
| "We couldn't reach internal consensus" | Stage ③ — problem with the IR deck itself | Strengthen your how-to, trade-off framing, and exit story |
| "One partner raised strong concerns" | Stage ④ — objection from another partner | Prepare supplementary materials and approach other firms |
| "Diligence surfaced things that need cleaning up" | Stage ⑤ — financial/legal housekeeping | Clean things up through an accountant and lawyer |
| "We couldn't close the gap on valuation" | Stage ⑥ — valuation negotiation | Rework your ask back within the standard range for your stage |
TIP
"An investor who rejects you quickly can be a gift." (Lee Taek-kyung, Ch. 4 — The Investment Process and What to Prepare) — a clear no gives you your next move; false hope doesn't.
Summary.
#What to Fix First at Each Stage
Once you see a pattern in which stage you're getting cut at, the priority order sets itself. Try to fix every stage at once, and you'll end up fixing none of them.
- Repeatedly cut at ① → fix formatting, your one-line pitch, and team intro — doable within a week
- Repeatedly cut at ② → build MVP, payment, and interview data — takes 3–6 months
- Repeatedly cut at ③ → run through the 8 IR-deck writing tips — a 2-week fix
- Repeatedly cut at ④ → prepare supplementary material to win over other partners, and change your point of contact
- Repeatedly cut at ⑤ → clean up finance and legal through an accountant and lawyer — 4–8 weeks
- Repeatedly cut at ⑥ → rethink your valuation negotiation tone (pride vs. treating valuation as a waypoint, not a destination)
CTA
OpenSeed's AI review automatically flags the formatting issues, unclear pitches, and missing how-to that put you at risk of getting cut in stages 1–3, modeled on the Mashup Angels persona. Get a stage-by-stage read on your cut risk before your first meeting, free during the current beta.
Find Out Which Stage You're Getting Cut At
Automatic stage-by-stage cut-risk analysis, modeled on the Mashup Angels persona.
🔒 Free during beta · your submission isn't saved
Start Free AI Feedback →