Intro.
#100 Reviewed → 2 Funded: the Full Funnel
In his book, Lee Taek-kyung of Mashup Angels shares a year's worth of actual funnel data from a hypothetical firm he calls "Firm B." There are six decision-making stages, and the reasons founders wash out differ at each one.
| Stage | Deals Reviewed | Stage Conversion | Cumulative Conversion |
|---|
| ① First Meeting | 100 | — | 100% |
| ② Follow-Up Meeting | 40 | 40% | 40% |
| ③ IR Pitch | 15 | 37.5% | 15% |
| ④ Preliminary IC | 8 | 53% | 8% |
| ⑤ Due Diligence | 5 | 62.5% | 5% |
| ⑥ Final IC | 3 | 60% | 3% |
| ⑦ Term Sheet & Funding | 2 | 67% | 2% |
TIP
Conversion rates from stage 4 onward (53–67%) vary relatively little between firms, but conversion rates for stages 1–3 vary wildly by firm (20–70%). In other words, if you're getting cut in stages 1–3, the problem is your business plan or IR materials themselves. If you're getting cut from stage 4 onward, it's a separate issue in due diligence or deal terms.
02
#Stage 1, First Meeting — 60 Deals Lost to Formatting and a Fuzzy One-Line Pitch
60 of every 100 deals end at the decision not to take a second meeting. Modeled on the Lee Taek-kyung persona, here are the most common reasons.
- Materials sent as HWP or DOC — never even opened (PDF is the standard)
- No team introduction — Lee's own phrase for this is a Korean expression for "a bun with no filling" (Ch. 4)
- Can't convey the core business model in under a minute — heavy on abstract buzzwords
- No stated funding amount or timing — makes stage-matching impossible from the start
- Blanket cold emails sent to investors whose stage or sector focus doesn't match
- Wrong investor's name left in the body of a cold email
주의
The rejection you get at this stage is usually a short line like "Best of luck with your business." You don't get a reason because the materials never cleared the bar for a real review.
03
#Stage 2, Follow-Up Meeting — 25 Deals Lost to Weak Pain Point Validation
Of the 40 deals that pass the first meeting, 25 either never get a follow-up scheduled or stall out after one is. This is where deals land when the first meeting went well but ended on a "let's keep watching" note.
| Common Reason | How the VC Puts It | Your Next Move |
|---|
| Weak pain point validation | "Is this really a problem customers will pay to solve?" | Add one piece of evidence — an MVP, interviews, or payment data — then request a follow-up |
| No basis for the market-size estimate | "The market looks small." | Back up TAM/SAM/SOM with objective data |
| Doubts about team cohesion | "How did you two co-founders meet?" | Clarify your shared work history and how responsibilities are split |
| Scheduling keeps slipping | "Let's find time again next month." | Even without a formal rejection, it's time to start looking at other prospects (Ch. 4) |
04
#Stage 3, IR Pitch — 7 Deals Lost to Deck-Writing Mistakes
Of the 15 deals invited to pitch, 7 wash out because of the IR deck itself. The direct cause is usually one of the frequently-broken rules from Lee's eight IR-deck writing tips (Ch. 5).
- All "what," no "how" — states the goal with no step-by-step strategy behind it
- Abstract buzzwords like "world's best" or "unrivaled" with no evidence behind them
- Claims to beat competitors on every single dimension — ignoring that trade-offs exist
- Over-emphasizes outside advisors — masking a weak full-time team
- Avoids mentioning profitability at all
- No mention of a path to exit (IPO or M&A)
TIP
Rejections at this stage usually sound like "we couldn't reach internal consensus this time." That's a signal there's room to re-approach in 6–12 months, once your core hypothesis is validated.
05
#Stages 4–6, IC and Due Diligence — 5 Deals Lost to Failed Verification
Of the 8 deals that clear the preliminary IC, only 3 make it through the final IC. Washouts in this range aren't about the IR deck anymore — they're mostly about "the numbers don't add up" or "legal and financial housekeeping isn't done."
| Stage | Reason | How the VC Puts It Internally |
|---|
| ④ Preliminary IC | Objection from another partner | "One of our partners raised strong concerns." |
| ⑤ Due Diligence | Issues with advances on the books, articles of incorporation, or IP ownership | "Diligence surfaced some things that still need cleaning up." |
| ⑥ Final IC | Valuation negotiations broke down | "We couldn't close the gap on valuation." |
| ⑦ Signing | Failed to agree on onerous terms (like joint-and-several liability under a share buyback/put-option clause) | "We couldn't agree on standard terms." |
06
#Reverse-Engineering Your Stage From the Tone of the Rejection
No VC will spell out "you got cut at stage 3." You have to reverse-engineer it from the tone of the rejection. This is exactly why Lee's book includes the line "an investor who rejects you quickly is doing you a favor" — read the tone correctly, and it becomes usable information for your next attempt.
| Rejection Tone | Likely Stage | Next Move |
|---|
| No response at all, or "Best of luck with your business" | Stage ① — formatting or an unclear one-line pitch | Fix your PDF, team intro, and one-line pitch, then try again |
| "Let's talk again once you've made more progress" | Stage ② — insufficient validation | Build an MVP and payment data, then re-approach in 6 months |
| "We couldn't reach internal consensus" | Stage ③ — problem with the IR deck itself | Strengthen your how-to, trade-off framing, and exit story |
| "One partner raised strong concerns" | Stage ④ — objection from another partner | Prepare supplementary materials and approach other firms |
| "Diligence surfaced things that need cleaning up" | Stage ⑤ — financial/legal housekeeping | Clean things up through an accountant and lawyer |
| "We couldn't close the gap on valuation" | Stage ⑥ — valuation negotiation | Rework your ask back within the standard range for your stage |
TIP
"An investor who rejects you quickly can be a gift." (Lee Taek-kyung, Ch. 4 — The Investment Process and What to Prepare) — a clear no gives you your next move; false hope doesn't.
Summary.
#What to Fix First at Each Stage
Once you see a pattern in which stage you're getting cut at, the priority order sets itself. Try to fix every stage at once, and you'll end up fixing none of them.
- Repeatedly cut at ① → fix formatting, your one-line pitch, and team intro — doable within a week
- Repeatedly cut at ② → build MVP, payment, and interview data — takes 3–6 months
- Repeatedly cut at ③ → run through the 8 IR-deck writing tips — a 2-week fix
- Repeatedly cut at ④ → prepare supplementary material to win over other partners, and change your point of contact
- Repeatedly cut at ⑤ → clean up finance and legal through an accountant and lawyer — 4–8 weeks
- Repeatedly cut at ⑥ → rethink your valuation negotiation tone (pride vs. treating valuation as a waypoint, not a destination)
CTA
OpenSeed's AI review automatically flags the formatting issues, unclear pitches, and missing how-to that put you at risk of getting cut in stages 1–3, modeled on the Mashup Angels persona. Get a stage-by-stage read on your cut risk before your first meeting, under the current payment terms shown on the analysis start screen.
Find Out Which Stage You're Getting Cut At
Automatic stage-by-stage cut-risk analysis, modeled on the Mashup Angels persona.
Pre-submission business-plan review with clear service limitations
Start OpenSeed Review →