#Standard IR Deck Structure — 10 Slides
| # | Slide | One-line takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover | Company name · one-line tagline · round |
| 2 | Problem | The size of the pain point customers face |
| 3 | Solution | Why our solution is different |
| 4 | Market size | TAM/SAM/SOM + sources |
| 5 | Business model | How we make money |
| 6 | Traction | Evidence of growth (MAU, revenue, LOIs, etc.) |
| 7 | Competitive analysis | Why only we can do this |
| 8 | Team | Why we can do this |
| 9 | Financials & roadmap | 12–24 month milestones |
| 10 | The ask | Amount · use of funds · next round |
The emphasis shifts by stage. Seed investors weigh team and problem most heavily; Pre-A investors weigh traction; Series A investors weigh unit economics.
#Cover Slide — Decided Within 30 Seconds
The first slide of an IR deck has four elements: company name, logo, tagline, and round information. The most important of these is the tagline — the one line of copy that explains your company.
| Weak tagline | Strong tagline |
|---|---|
| An AI-powered healthcare platform | The app that gets office workers from 'done with the gym' to 'dinner decided' in 30 seconds |
| An innovative SaaS solution | The hiring SaaS that cuts a startup's first engineering hire from 4 months to 4 weeks |
#Problem & Solution — They Work as a Pair
Problem and solution should always be read as a pair. A good problem slide proves urgency with a number; a good solution slide shows, at a glance, 'X times better than the status quo.'
- Problem: who / how often / how much is lost
- Solution: the difference in time, cost, or outcome versus the status quo
- Visualization: a before/after comparison, or a demo GIF/image
Focus on 'why the customer chooses our solution,' not technical differentiation for its own sake. VCs aren't looking for the company with the coolest tech — they're looking for the company that generates serious revenue.
#Market Size — Presenting It Without Breaking Trust
The three most common mistakes on a market-size slide: (1) a big number with no source, (2) showing TAM alone with no SAM or SOM, and (3) inflating TAM into the size of an entire industry.
| Checklist item | Standard |
|---|---|
| TAM source | A credible source (industry report, government statistics agency, research firm) |
| SAM definition | Narrowed to the specific segment we can actually reach |
| SOM timeframe | Realistically obtainable within 24–36 months |
| Year | Use the most recent data available (2024–2025) |
| Currency & units | Stay consistent in one currency — don't mix |
#Traction — Prove Execution With Numbers
At seed stage, VCs weigh a team's ability to execute more than the idea itself. The traction slide is where you prove that execution with numbers. If you don't have revenue yet, prove it with a different metric instead.
- Revenue stage — MoM/QoQ growth rate, ARR, GMV
- User stage — MAU/DAU, retention curve, NPS
- Pre-revenue stage — waitlist size, number of LOIs, pilot contracts
- B2B stage — pipeline value ($), average sales cycle, close rate
#Team — Founder-Market Fit
The team slide isn't a resume. The core question is 'why can this specific team pull off this specific business in this specific market' — that's Founder-Market Fit. Domain expertise and proof of execution matter more than degrees or job titles.
- Domain expertise — years of experience in this specific market
- Proof of execution — 'previously built X' / 'previously ran X'
- Network — relationships with key customers, partners, and advisors
- Composition — is the split between tech, business, and sales roles clear
#The Ask — Amount, Use of Funds, Next Round
The ask slide is the last one in the deck, but it's also the one most often written weakly. Don't just end with 'raising ₩X' — pair it with the three things below.
- Round size — total amount for this round, and whether it's a solo or co-led round
- Use of funds — product/engineering (X%) / marketing (X%) / operations (X%)
- Milestones — the next stage you'll hit within 12–18 months (Series A readiness, profitability, etc.)
Valuation is often left off the slide entirely. It's typically discussed separately in the meeting — stating it too early weakens your negotiating position.
#Five Common IR Deck Red Flags
- 'No competitors' — signals either weak market research or that the market itself doesn't exist
- TAM alone with no SAM/SOM — reads as not having seriously studied the market
- No Y-axis unit on the traction graph — the visualization VCs distrust most
- Team slide that lists only degrees — fails to demonstrate Founder-Market Fit
- Use-of-funds shown only as percentages with no concrete activities — raises doubts about your ability to manage capital
#Checking Your IR Deck With AI Feedback
As the person who wrote it, you're too close to your IR deck to see its weaknesses. Getting a mentor's review means scheduling time, and catching your weak points before you send the deck to a VC matters enormously.
Prep for Investor Meetings With AI Feedback on Your IR Deck
OpenSeed's AI review analyzes your IR deck's 10-slide structure and flags potential red flags.
Pre-submission business-plan review with clear service limitations
Start OpenSeed Review →