Article
OpenSeed Product Guide

The 30-Minute First Submission Workflow — From Self-Check to Your OpenSeed Analysis

2026.05.28·7 min·OPENSEED

For founders using OpenSeed for the first time, the place they most often get stuck isn't the 'AI analysis' itself — it's the step right before it. What file format should I upload? How much do I need to fill in? Once I get a score, where do I even start reading? This article is a practical, cold-start workflow for someone uploading a business plan to OpenSeed for the first time, taking them from zero to a Round 1 analysis report in 30 minutes.

Intro.

#Before You Start (3 min) — How to Bring In Your Business Plan

Step 5 of the OpenSeed /start flow accepts your business plan body text as `.md`, `.markdown`, or `.txt`. Direct PDF or DOCX uploads aren't currently supported, so if you already have a business plan, you'll need to move the body text into one of these formats.

Original FormatHow to Convert
Google DocsFile → Download → .txt or Markdown (.md)
Notion pageExport → Markdown (.md) — tables and images convert automatically
MS Word (.docx)File → Save As → Plain Text (.txt)
PDF (not scanned)Extract the text, then save as .txt (on Mac: Preview → select text → copy)
Only have handwritten notes or a slide deckWrite up the key content directly as .md (aim for 500+ characters)

We recommend at least 1,500 characters of body text. Text under 500 characters doesn't give the 15 AI reviewers enough signal to analyze, which lowers the accuracy of both the score and the comments.

02

#Steps 1–4 (5 min) — The 4 Founder-Context Inputs

The first four steps of the /start screen, beyond the body of your business plan, are context inputs that determine how the review criteria get calibrated. Each step takes an average of 30–60 seconds.

StepInputHow to Choose
1. Founder typeStudent · Prospective · Early-stage · Grant applicant (4 types)If you haven't registered a business yet, choose 'Prospective'; if you're in years 1–3, choose 'Early-stage'; if you're seeking evaluation for a government grant program, choose 'Grant applicant'
2. IndustryIT, biotech, fintech, content, social, etc.Pick the single industry where your core revenue comes from
3. TeamSolo · 2 people · 3+ people · incorporated or notEven with a co-founder, list yourself as solo if you haven't signed a formal agreement yet
4. MarketDomestic · domestic + overseas · overseas-focusedBase this on your current revenue/target market, not your future plans

These four inputs adjust how the 15 AI reviewers weight their evaluation. For example: a student founder + biotech + solo team + domestic market gets a deeper look at 'fit for Korea's Pre-Startup Package / Youth Startup Academy programs,' while an early-stage + fintech + 3-person team + overseas market gets a deeper look at 'fit for a Series A raise.'

03

#Step 5 (10 min) — Entering Your Business Plan Body

Step 5 is where you paste in your actual business plan text or drag in a .md/.txt file. This is the step that takes the longest, and 80% of your result's accuracy is determined here.

  • Minimum 1,500 characters, 3,000–5,000 characters recommended
  • Keep any existing document structure as-is (headings, subheadings, bullet points, tables)
  • If you're using a Pre-Startup Package or Early Startup Package template, the P-S-S-T structure works fine as-is
  • For an IR deck, organize the text slide by slide, with the slide number attached
  • Add text descriptions for images and charts (e.g., 'Graph 1: 2024 revenue ₩100M → 2025 revenue ₩300M')

If you choose to upload a file, only .md/.markdown/.txt work. Trying a PDF triggers an 'unsupported file type' error. Convert it to text and upload again.

04

#Step 6 → Analysis (5 min) — Payment and 15 Parallel Reviews

You request the analysis in Step 6 (currently free during the beta period). Once requested, analysis starts automatically, and 15 AI reviewers work in parallel to do the following:

Assigned ToNumber of ReviewersWhat They Do
Core system7Standard evaluation across the 4 P-S-S-T axes, market viability, technical merit, team, and finances
SpecialistsUp to 7Auto-matched by industry and stage (e.g., SaaS specialist, government-grant specialist, IR deck specialist)
IC Chair1Synthesizes all 15 reviewers' comments into a final verdict

The analysis itself typically finishes in 2–4 minutes. Even including payment processing time, you'll reach your report within 5 minutes. Even if you close the results screen, it's automatically saved to your account, so you can reopen it anytime from /history.

05

#Your Round 1 Report — Where to Start Reading

When the report opens, the first thing you see is the overall star rating and the verdict. But there's a specific reading order we recommend for first-time users.

  • 1. **The one-line verdict** — an overall judgment like 'High chance of passing / Needs revision / At risk of rejection'
  • 2. **The red flags section** — weaknesses that multiple reviewers flagged in common (the reasons your score is lower)
  • 3. **Category-by-category ratings** — which axis is weak (market viability, team, finances, etc.)
  • 4. **Sentence-level rewrites** — concrete revision suggestions for weak sentences
  • 5. **Comparison to successful applicants** — how you stack up against similar businesses that passed

90% of first-time users read in the order of overall score → detailed comments, but in practice, what actually helps most is starting with the red flags. You need to know 'why you lost points' before you can decide where to start revising.

06

#Moving to Round 2 — The Revise-and-Resubmit Cycle

If you fix 3–5 of the red flags from your Round 1 report in the body text and then run Round 2, the same 15 reviewers evaluate it again against the same criteria. Because a consistency guarantee applies, the same sentence gets the same score.

RoundRecommended WorkExpected Score Change
Round 1Submit as-is → check red flagsEstablish your baseline
Round 2Fix 3–5 red flags, then resubmit+5 to +10 points (with market and team improvements)
Round 3Tailor to a government-grant template / convert to an IR deck+3 to +5 points (reaching the passing bar)

From Round 2 onward, you can request a new analysis of the same business plan using the 'Re-review' button on the results screen. Since each round requests a fresh analysis, we recommend resubmitting only after making substantial revisions.

Summary.

#Common Sticking Points — First-Time User Troubleshooting

SymptomCauseFix
PDF upload fails at Step 5Only .md/.txt are currently supportedExtract the text and convert it to .txt
Analysis doesn't finish after 5+ minutesTemporary load on the Anthropic APIRefresh at /history — results are saved automatically
Score comes back too low (50s)Body text is too short (under 1,500 characters)Expand the body text, then run Round 2
Same business plan, different scoreYou may have selected a different founder typeThe founder type in Step 1 determines the evaluation criteria
Analysis doesn't start after requesting itYour draft may have expiredStart over from Step 1 — drafts auto-save for 24 hours
CTA
Your first OpenSeed submission takes just 30 minutes. Fixing even 3–5 red flags after your Round 1 report noticeably raises your chances of passing. Get a consistent analysis from 15 AI reviewers, free during the current beta period.
광고

You Can Get Your First Analysis Report in 30 Minutes

Convert your business plan to .md/.txt → complete the 6-step input flow → get a parallel analysis from 15 AI reviewers.

🔒 Free during beta · your submission isn't saved

Start Free AI Feedback →

관련 AI 피드백 서비스.

AI 피드백
사업계획서 AI 추천
AI 피드백
사업계획서 피드백
AI 피드백
예비창업패키지 점검
RELATED · Same categoryOpenSeed Product Guide
Why OpenSeed Doesn't Accept IR Decks2026.07.12 · 5 minWhen Repeated OpenSeed Analysis Stops Moving the Needle: Diagnosing the Plateau and Breaking Through It2026.07.03 · 8 minHow to Turn OpenSeed's Multi-Round Analysis Data Into Evidence for Your IR Prep2026.06.29 · 8 minTurning OpenSeed's Per-Category Diagnosis Into a Business Plan Revision Order2026.06.21 · 8 minOpenSeed Avatar Selection Guide: The Best Combination for Government Grants, VC, and Accelerator Reviews2026.06.16 · 8 min
← Back to Discovery